The Conflict Between Globalization and Traditionalism in “Jihad vs. McWorld” by Benjamin R. Barber

The Article “Jihad vs. McWorld” by Benjamin R. Barber

The article “Jihad vs. McWorld” by Benjamin R. Barber discusses the conflict between globalization and traditionalism and its impact on politics and culture.

The topic of the article “Jihad vs. McWorld” by Benjamin R. Barber of The Atlantic is the conflict between globalization (McWorld) and traditionalism (Jihad). Barber's thesis is that the tension between these two forces will shape the future of politics and culture.

The article is organized topically, exploring different aspects of globalization and traditionalism, and their implications.

Barber argues that the forces of McWorld, representing globalization, and Jihad, representing traditionalism and tribalism, are at odds with each other. McWorld promotes uniformity, consumerism, and a borderless world, while Jihad seeks to preserve local traditions, identities, and values.

Barber warns that the clash between these two forces can lead to conflicts, tensions, and challenges for governance. He suggests that a balance between the two is necessary for a stable and sustainable global society.

The article delves into the political, cultural, and economic implications of the conflict between globalization and traditionalism, pointing out the challenges and opportunities that arise from their interaction.

What is the topic of the article “Jihad vs. McWorld” by Benjamin R. Barber of The Atlantic? What is Barber’s thesis? Is it organized chronologically or topically? The topic of the article “Jihad vs. McWorld” by Benjamin R. Barber of The Atlantic is the conflict between globalization (McWorld) and traditionalism (Jihad). Barber's thesis is that the tension between these two forces will shape the future of politics and culture. The article is organized topically, exploring different aspects of globalization and traditionalism, and their implications.
← Confronting fears underwater a journey of discovery The invisibility of interracial couples in steinbugler s study →