Homework: Finding Effective Approaches for Student Motivation

Which statement about homework is false?

A. If the administration insists on homework, and you disagree, assign it but count it as bonus.

B. Reward children who are self-disciplined enough to bring in homework.

C. Homework causes unnecessary friction between children and their families.

D. Punishing children academically for failure to do homework increases motivation.

Final answer:

The false statement is that punishing children academically for failure to do homework increases their motivation; in reality, punishment may actually reduce motivation. Positive reinforcement and understanding individual student's challenges are more effective approaches. Proposals such as regular testing and offering school vouchers are being considered to improve educational outcomes.

Explanation:

The statement about homework that is false is: punishing children academically for failure to do homework, increases motivation. This statement is untrue as punishment often leads to negative attitudes towards learning and can diminish motivation. Instead, other practices such as positive reinforcement and understanding individual student circumstances can be more effective.

For example, rewarding students who consistently complete their homework can be a form of positive reinforcement, which can help to increase self-discipline and motivation to learn. On the other hand, understanding the socioeconomic challenges that some students may face, such as those from working-class families who have substantial home responsibilities or lack access to technology, indicates a need for flexible and supportive homework policies.

Programs that alter the incentives that schools face, such as those proposing regular student testing, additional teacher training, school vouchers, or new school creation, aim to improve education outcomes but their effectiveness remains to be fully evidenced.

← Weathering processes unveiling the secrets of nature s sculptors Laundry list exploring the effectiveness of detailed lists →