The Comparison of the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan

The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two significant proposals put forth during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The New Jersey Plan, presented by smaller states, advocated for equal representation of all states in the legislature. On the other hand, the Virginia Plan, supported by larger states, proposed representation based on population.

During the discussions at the Constitutional Convention, the New Jersey Plan emphasized the importance of maintaining equal representation for all states. This was particularly favored by states with smaller populations, as they wanted to ensure that their voices were heard and their interests protected in the new government.

In contrast, the Virginia Plan sought to establish a system where states with larger populations would have more representation in the legislature. This was supported by states such as Virginia, which believed that population should be a key factor in determining influence and power in the government.

After much debate and deliberation, a compromise known as the Great Compromise was reached. This compromise incorporated elements from both the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan, resulting in the creation of a bicameral legislature. The Senate provided equal representation for all states, similar to the New Jersey Plan, while the House of Representatives allocated representation based on population, in line with the Virginia Plan.

Ultimately, the Great Compromise struck a balance between the competing interests of larger and smaller states, ensuring that both had a stake in the new government. This compromise laid the foundation for the structure of the United States government as we know it today.