Constructing a Learning Environment with Instructional Design

Is the student's work considered plagiarism?

A. Plagiarism B. Not Plagiarism C. Option 3 D. Option 4

Answer:

The student's work does not constitute plagiarism; instead, it reflects the appropriate academic technique of reframing original material in a contextually appropriate manner.

The main goal of any instructional design process is to construct a learning environment that fosters desired learning processes for learners. This involves creating a structured approach to learning that provides the necessary conditions and resources for effective knowledge acquisition and skills development.

When it comes to evaluating whether the student's work is considered plagiarism, it is essential to understand the concept of originality and proper attribution in academic writing. In this case, the student has paraphrased the original source material while maintaining the core ideas and concepts without directly copying the content. This practice is common in academic settings and is known as rephrasing or reframing information to fit a specific context or argument.

Plagiarism is the act of presenting someone else's work or ideas as your own without proper acknowledgment or citation. In this scenario, the student has appropriately cited the original source material, indicating a clear distinction between the original content and the student's interpretation of it. Therefore, the student's work does not constitute plagiarism.

It is crucial for students to understand the principles of academic integrity, including the importance of citing sources and avoiding plagiarism. By properly attributing sources and demonstrating an understanding of the material through rephrasing and interpretation, students can engage in ethical and effective academic writing practices.