Context-Free Grammars: Exploring Language Patterns

Can you find context-free grammars for the following languages?

(a) L={anbm:n≤m+3}

(b) L={anbm:n=m−1}

(c) L={anbm:n=2m}

(d) L={anbm:2n≤m≤3n}

(e) L={w∈{a,b}∗:na​(w)=nb​(w)}

(f) L={w∈{a,b}∗:na​(v)≥nb​(v), where v is any prefix of w}

(g) L={w∈{a,b}∗:na​(w)=2nb​(w)+1}

Answer:

In summary, the context-free grammars for the given languages are as follows:

(a) S → aSb | aSbb | ε

(b) S → aSb | ε

(c) S → aSb | aSbb | aaSbb | ε

(d) S → aaSbb | aSbbb | ε

(e) S → aSb | bSa | aS | bS | ε

(f) S → aSb | aSS | ε

(g) S → aSbb | aSb | ε

Explanation:

In order to find the context-free grammars for the given languages, we need to define the production rules for each language. Let's go through each language one by one:

(a) L={anbm:n≤m+3}

The production rules for this language can be defined as:

S → aSb | aSbb | ε

(b) L={anbm:n=m−1}

The production rules for this language can be defined as:

S → aSb | ε

(c) L={anbm:n=2m}

The production rules for this language can be defined as:

S → aSb | aSbb | aaSbb | ε

(d) L={anbm:2n≤m≤3n}

The production rules for this language can be defined as:

S → aaSbb | aSbbb | ε

(e) L={w∈{a,b}∗:na​(w)=nb​(w)}

The production rules for this language can be defined as:

S → aSb | bSa | aS | bS | ε

(f) L={w∈{a,b}∗:na​(v)≥nb​(v), where v is any prefix of w}

The production rules for this language can be defined as:

S → aSb | aSS | ε

(g) L={w∈{a,b}∗:na​(w)=2nb​(w)+1}

The production rules for this language can be defined as:

S → aSbb | aSb | ε

← Why does a resistance spot weld often appear oval shaped Network diagrams understanding the infrastructures →