The Cost Advantage of Synthetic Fibers in Clothing Production

What characteristic of synthetic fiber makes it more attractive than natural fiber for making clothing?

The characteristic of synthetic fiber that makes it more attractive than natural fiber for making clothing is A) Cost.

The Cost Advantage of Synthetic Fibers

Cost: Synthetic fibers have gained popularity in the textile industry due to various factors that make them appealing for clothing production. One significant factor is cost-efficiency. Synthetic fibers are generally less expensive to produce compared to natural fibers. This cost advantage stems from the fact that natural fibers require resources like land, water, and agricultural processes to grow and harvest. In contrast, synthetic fibers are manufactured through chemical processes, which can be more controlled and efficient. Additionally, synthetic fibers possess other beneficial characteristics that contribute to their appeal. They often have low absorbency and are water-resistant, which can be advantageous for certain types of clothing. For example, swimwear and activewear benefit from synthetic fibers' ability to repel water and dry quickly. Synthetic fibers also tend to have good shape retention and durability, making them suitable for garments that need to maintain their form and withstand frequent use and washing. While options B) Shape Retention and C) Durability are indeed advantages of synthetic fibers, the most direct reason that makes synthetic fibers more attractive than natural fibers is their lower cost. This cost-effectiveness can lead to more affordable clothing options for consumers while still providing functional and desirable characteristics. In conclusion, the cost advantage of synthetic fibers compared to natural fibers makes them a more attractive option for making clothing, although their other attributes like shape retention and durability also contribute to their popularity in the fashion industry.
← Determining the density of a metal object Molar volumes of solid and liquid lead at normal melting temperature →